Non-Judicial Stamp Paper is required for this contract to be sworn before a First Class Magistrate or a Notary in the State. Check stamp duty charges in another state: Select state
Andaman & Nicobar Islands
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshdweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Other Territory
Puducherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal

Stamp paper is not included with this agreement and is for illustration purposes only. If e -stamp is applicable in your city you can order it during checkout.

GUIDELINE

Guideline for Drafting Arbitral Award by Three Arbitrators:

This document is essential in arbitration proceedings where three arbitrators collaborate to reach a joint decision. Here's a concise guide for drafting this award:

Title and Identification: Clearly title the document as "Arbitral Award by Three Arbitrators." Include names of the parties, case reference, and details of the arbitration.

Introduction and Tribunal Identification: Begin with an introduction, identifying each arbitrator and emphasizing the collaborative nature of the decision-making process.

Background and Reference: Provide a concise overview of the dispute, outlining the claims, counterclaims, and key issues presented during the arbitration proceedings.

Legal Framework: Establish the legal framework governing the arbitration process, citing relevant arbitration rules and laws applicable to the case.

Joint Findings and Conclusions: Clearly outline the joint findings and conclusions reached by the three arbitrators on the merits of the dispute.

Common Mistakes to Avoid:

Inconsistent Language: Ensure consistency in language and tone throughout the award to present a unified and coherent document.

Neglecting Legal Framework: Clearly identify the arbitration rules and laws governing the proceedings to avoid challenges to the validity of the award.

Ambiguous Findings: Use precise language in presenting joint findings to avoid confusion or misinterpretation by the parties.

Neglecting Evidence: Consider all relevant evidence presented during the arbitration process to make well-informed joint findings.

Lack of Clarity in Conclusions: Clearly articulate the joint conclusions on the merits of the dispute, providing transparency in the decision-making process.

By adhering to these guidelines and avoiding common mistakes, a well-drafted Arbitral Award by Three Arbitrators ensures a clear, consistent, and legally sound resolution to disputes in arbitration proceedings involving a panel of arbitrators. This type of award is commonly used in complex commercial arbitrations and international disputes.

Share This Document :