Non-Judicial Stamp Paper is required for this contract to be sworn before a First Class Magistrate or a Notary in the State. Check stamp duty charges in another state: Select state
Andaman & Nicobar Islands
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Dadra & Nagar Haveli
Daman & Diu
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshdweep
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Odisha
Other Territory
Puducherry
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal

Stamp paper is not included with this agreement and is for illustration purposes only. If e -stamp is applicable in your city you can order it during checkout.

GUIDELINE

Guideline for Drafting Arbitral Award by Two out of the Three Arbitrators:

This document is utilized in arbitration proceedings involving three arbitrators, where a decision is reached by a majority of two arbitrators. Here's a brief guide for drafting this award:

Title and Identification: Clearly title the document as "Arbitral Award by Two out of the Three Arbitrators." Include the names of the arbitrators, parties involved, and the case reference.

Background and Reference: Summarize the key facts, claims, and counterclaims, providing a brief overview of the dispute that led to arbitration.

Legal Framework: Establish the legal framework governing the arbitration process, citing applicable arbitration rules and laws.

Majority Findings: Clearly outline the majority findings and conclusions reached by the two arbitrators, specifying the grounds for their decision.

Dissenting Opinion, if any: If applicable, address any dissenting opinions or reservations expressed by the third arbitrator, providing a complete picture of the decision-making process.

Common Mistakes to Avoid:

Inconsistent Language: Ensure consistency in language and tone throughout the award to present a unified and coherent document.

Neglecting Legal Framework: Clearly identify the arbitration rules and laws governing the proceedings to avoid challenges to the validity of the award.

Omission of Key Findings: Address all key findings and conclusions comprehensively, leaving no room for ambiguity or misunderstanding.

Unclear Attribution of Statements: Clearly attribute statements or opinions to the majority arbitrators and the dissenting arbitrator to avoid confusion.

Failure to Address Dissenting Opinions: If applicable, acknowledge and address dissenting opinions to provide a transparent record of the decision-making process.

By adhering to these guidelines and avoiding common mistakes, a well-drafted Arbitral Award by Two out of the Three Arbitrators ensures a clear, consistent, and legally sound resolution to disputes in arbitration proceedings involving a three-member arbitral tribunal. This type of award is commonly used in complex commercial arbitrations and international disputes.

Share This Document :